By Hashem Ahelbarra
Peace talks between the Palestinians and the Israelis have once again shipwrecked on an ocean of semantic squabbling.
Relaunched in September, the talks have tested a core premise of the American diplomatic effort in the Middle East: bringing the two sides to sit down and hammer out a comprehensive peace deal that would pave the way to the creation of a Palestinian state.
After three rounds of direct talks in Washington, DC, the Egyptian resort of Sharm el Sheikh and Jerusalem, negotiations collapsed when Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, refused to extend a moratorium on illegal settlement construction in the West Bank.
The Palestinians and the Israelis haven't had a chance to tackle core issues: the borders of the future state, security, the refugees, Jerusalem and the settlements.
US officials fear the ongoing impasse will further complicate their mission and make hopes of an accord nearly impossible.
Now eyes are turned to a powwow of Arab leaders in the Libyan coastal city of Sirte. The outcome of the meeting will most likely give clear indications as to whether the Palestinians will return to the negotiating table or not.
Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian president, is expected to brief Arab leaders on what happened during the talks and ask for their backing in the final statement of the summit.
If the summit endorses the decision of the Palestinians to stay away from talks with the Israelis, Abbas will have more leverage in future encounters with US officials. He can confidently tell them that he cannot betray an Arab decision.
But even if the US puts all of its resources and shuttle diplomacy to achieving a positive outcome, winning a yes for resuming talks from Arab leaders may not be an easy task.
Public opinion in the Arab world is against the resumption of talks under the pro-settlements right-wing government in Israel. Arab leaders will undoubtedly echo the same sentiment in Sirte.
Since its establishment in 1945, the Arab League has been incapable of laying down the foundations for a regional institution with sound political and economic strategies.
Ties between some member states are strained, while key players like Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Syria are occasionally embroiled in rows over who should lead the Arab world.
Hashem Ahelbarra is a roving Middle East correspondent for Al Jazeera English.
|< Prev||Next >|
Other articles in Politics
Escaping The Abusive State: After Snowden 06 December 2013
Obama Hardball Interview: A Waste of Time 06 December 2013
In Afghanistan, They Died for No Good Cause 05 December 2013
Will Oceania, I mean America, re-embrace Syria? 05 December 2013
France Lies for Israel 04 December 2013
Hospital Price-Gouging Widespread: N.Y. Times 04 December 2013
Killing Children in Afghanistan 02 December 2013
Who really runs America? 02 December 2013
Nakba II -Israel is Testing The Water 30 November 2013
Thanksgiving 2013 30 November 2013
|Timothy V. Gatto|