By Teymoor Nabili
The New York Times has decided that the Iran angle is the most significant element of the latest WikiLeaks package.
Among the elements the newspaper highlights is a report that the US hikers arrested by Iran in July 2009 may have been taken on the Iraq side of the border.
The way I read the relevant document, it seems the report was filed by soldiers who arrived late to the scene and relied on hearsay.
Many will take it as definitive proof of a kidnap; to me, it's impossible to conclude with any real confidence what really happened.
But the really interesting comment comes at the end of the document, under the heading "S2 assessment":
The lack of co-ordination on the part of these hikers, particularly after being forewarned, indicates an intent to agitate and create publicity regarding international policies on Iran.
It would appear that the military not only knew of the hikers' presence in the region, but warned them in advance that they were inviting trouble.
Furthermore, it seems the military themselves concluded the hikers were there with the express purpose of creating publicity ... not rock climbing or hiking.
Teymoor Nabili is an award-winning presenter and correspondent based in Kuala Lumpur.
|< Prev||Next >|
Most Read News
- Jill Stein changes strategy in Pennsylvania recount
- Army advances in Aleppo as Russia blocks UN truce plan
- US colleges move to protect undocumented students
- Libyan forces claim control of ISIL stronghold of Sirte
- Austria's Norbert Hofer defeated in presidential race
- Suspected Russian warplanes bomb Idlib, dozens killed
- OPEC seeks to nail down oil output cut in Vienna
- Will Trump play into the hands of Iranian hardliners?
- Scores killed in Iran train collision
- Iran: More than 1,000 soldiers die in Syria since 2011
- WikiLeaks' Assange questioned at the Ecuadorian embassy
- Israel: Iran should not base itself militarily in Syria
Should US President-elect Donald Trump's opponents be protesting against the election result?