Monday, January 22, 2018
Text Size

Site Search powered by Ajax

Hydrogen bomb vs Atomic bomb: What's the difference?

Experts say the fundamental difference between a hydrogen and atomic bomb is the detonation process.

The hydrogen bomb

North Korea has long sought the means to deliver an atomic warhead to the United States, its sworn enemy, and Sunday's nuclear test followed reports it could load a hydrogen bomb onto an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).

Hydrogen bombs, or H-bombs, are far more powerful than the relatively simple atomic weapons the North was believed to have tested so far.

As opposed to the atomic bomb - the kind dropped on Japan by the US in the closing days of World War II - the hydrogen bomb can be 1,000 times more powerful.

READ MORE: North Korea confirms sixth nuclear test 

North Korea's first three nuclear tests from 2006 to 2013 were atomic bombs on roughly the same scale as the ones used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which together killed more than 200,000 people.

However, Sunday's test is estimated to have a yield of about 100 kilotons, 10 times stronger than last year's test that caused a 5.3 magnitude quake.

A jubilant North Korean newsreader hailed the "unprecedentedly large" blast on state television, adding it "marked a very significant occasion in attaining the final goal of completing the state nuclear force".

The hydrogen bomb, also called a thermonuclear bomb, uses fusion - or atomic nuclei coming together - to produce explosive energy. Stars also produce energy through fusion.

Atomic bombs rely on fission, or atom-splitting, just as nuclear power plants do. 

The technology of the hydrogen bomb is more sophisticated, and once attained, it is a greater threat. It can also be made small enough to fit on a head of an ICBM.

"Such a device could evaporate the entire city of New York completely - no one would stay alive," Andrei Lankov, a professor of Korean studies at Kookmin University in Seoul, said.

"With an atomic bomb you can kill half of Manhattan, at most."

READ MORE: World leaders unite in condemnation of North Korea 

While much more potent, H-bombs are also much more costly.

"For the North Koreans to have such a powerful and expensive [device] is a bit of overkill - it simply does not make sense," Lankov said.

"It's like buying a Porsche to go shopping in a shop nearby... It's a very expensive programme which will not really make a major contribution towards their security. But governments sometimes do crazy things."

The hydrogen bomb is the global standard for the five nations with the greatest nuclear capabilities: the US, Russia, France, the UK and China.

Other nations may also either have it or are working on it, despite a worldwide effort to contain such proliferation.

Kune Y Suh, a nuclear engineering professor at Seoul National University, called Sunday's test a "game changer".

"North Korea has effectively established itself as a nuclear state. This is not just a game changer, it's a game over," Suh said.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe via RSS or Email:

Joyce brings joy to Western Austral...

Read More

North and South Korea to field join...

Read More

China bans Muslim children from Qur...

Read More

Hong Kong activists jailed for role...

Read More

Fiji PM: 'We are losing the battle'...

Read More

North and South Korea discuss troup...

Read More


Fresh elections avoided for now as Social Democrats approve negotiations with Merkel's conservatives by 56 percent.

Read More


Thanks to all of our supporters for your generosity and your encouragement of an independent press!

Enter Amount:



Login reminder Forgot login?

Subscribe to MWC News Alert

Email Address

Subscribe in a reader Facebok page Twitter page

Week in Pictures

From snowfall to sunshine

Palestinians hold 'day of rage'