Monday, March 19, 2018
Text Size

Site Search powered by Ajax

India's top court rules privacy is a fundamental right

Landmark verdict could have far reaching consequences for government's biometric identification programme.

India's Supreme Court has ruled that citizens have a constitutional right to privacy, a landmark verdict that could derail a controversial biometric identification programme that the government is pushing on its people.

A nine-judge bench ruled unanimously on Thursday that the right to privacy was "protected as an intrinsic part of Article 21 that protects life and liberty", in a case that challenges Prime Minister Narendra Modi's decision to make biometric ID cards, known as Aadhaar, mandatory.

Aadhaar, which has recorded the fingerprints and iris scans of more than one billion Indians, was set up as a voluntary scheme to streamline benefit payments to millions of poor people and cut fraud.

But in recent years it has become compulsory for a growing number of services, including opening a bank account or paying taxes.

Opponents have argued that its use for essential services means the right to privacy is increasingly being violated.

Activists say Aadhaar links enough data to create a comprehensive profile of a person's spending habits, their friends and acquaintances, the property they own, and a trove of other information.

'Litmus test' of Indian democracy

Lawyer Prashant Bhushan told reporters outside the court that the judgement would likely impact the programme.

"Any fundamental right is subject to reasonable restrictions by law. Whether the Aadhaar Act imposes unreasonable restrictions will have to be examined," he said.

Modi's government has rejected suggestions that the programme, set up in 2009, poses a threat to civil liberties, despite personal data being leaked in security breaches.

In May, security researchers at the Centre for Internet and Society reported that the information of as many as 135 million people had been leaked online.

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), the agency that governs Aadhaar, has repeatedly said that its data is secure.

During the hearings, the Supreme Court bench recognised the risk of personal information being misused, and the challenge of protecting such private data in the internet era.

But the judges also acknowledged there must be restrictions within reason on individual privacy.

Constitutional law scholars had said the case would be a litmus test of Indian democracy, with potentially far-reaching consequences if individuals were allowed to challenge laws on the basis of individual rights.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe via RSS or Email:

Afghan baby named after 'infidel' D...

Read More

Taliban suicide bomber targets fore...

Read More

Myanmar's ethnic Rakhine seek Rohin...

Read More

Six killed in Raiwind explosion cla...

Read More

UN: Facebook had a 'role' in Rohing...

Read More

'Miscommunication' blamed for deadl...

Read More


Qatar's central bank asks US to investigate Emirati bank accused of waging 'financial warfare' against it.

Read More


Thanks to all of our supporters for your generosity and your encouragement of an independent press!

Enter Amount:



Login reminder Forgot login?

Subscribe to MWC News Alert

Email Address

Subscribe in a reader Facebok page Twitter page

Week in Pictures

One year under Trump

Gun violence in US