Monday, September 24, 2018
   
Text Size

Site Search powered by Ajax

Theresa May defends Syria strikes in parliament

Rejecting accusations of US pressure, UK PM says involvement in Saturday's coordinated attack was in national interest.

Theresa May

Britain's prime minister has defended UK's decision to launch coordinated strikes with American and French forces, in an attempt to "further prevent the use of chemical weapons" in Syria.

Speaking at the House of Commons on Monday, Theresa May said Britain's involvement in Saturday's attacks on Syria's alleged chemical weapons sites was in the national interest.

"We have not done this because [US] President [Donald] Trump asked us to do so," she told parliament.

"We have done it because we believe it was the right thing to do and we are not alone."

Many opposition MPs have questioned May's decision to join the attack without seeking parliamentary approval.

Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the opposition Labour Party, reiterated his stance that May is "accountable to the parliament - not to the whims of the US president".

He also questioned the legal justification of the attack, saying it was not in line with the UN Security Council's charter.

"There is no more serious issue than the life and death matters of military action," he said on Monday.

"It is right that parliament has the power to support or stop the government from taking planned military action."

Vote on the strike

For its part, the Scottish National Party says it will force a vote on the issue.

Since the Iraq war in 2003, under Britain's constitutional convention parliament expects an opportunity to debate the matter if British troops are to be involved in military combat.

Saturday's strikes, which came in response to a suspected chemical attack on the former rebel stronghold of Douma on April 7, targeted the sites near Damascus as well as in the province of Homs.

Confirming Britain's involvement in the attack in her speech, May said: "We would have preferred an alternative path. But on this occasion there is none."

She said the attacks were not about "regime change" or "intervening in a civil war", but were to "deter the use of chemical weapons" by the Syrian government.

After her statement, May was expected to ask the speaker of the parliament to grant an emergency debate, followed possibly by a non-binding vote.

chemical-attack-map


blog comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe via RSS or Email:

Storm Ali leaves two dead in Ireland

Read More

Marine Le Pen ordered to take psych evaluation over ISIL tweets

Read More

European leaders pour scorn on British PM's Brexit plan

Read More

Embattled UK leader defiant after Brexit plan attacked

Read More

Russia cancels local election results in Far East after protests

Read More

Russian official calls for election rerun over vote fraud

Read More

Donation

Thanks to all of our supporters for your generosity and your encouragement of an independent press!

Enter Amount:

Featured_Author

Login






Login reminder Forgot login?

Subscribe to MWC News Alert

Email Address

Subscribe in a reader Facebok page Twitter page

Israel pounds Gaza

India's Kerala state devastated

Capturing life under apartheid